
The study makes the assumption that the oldest populations would have the greatest genetic diversity and that this genetic diversity decreases as people move away from the origin. It sounds pretty cool… I’m constantly amazed at how clever people are in their ways to try to find things out. The other day, I watched a show about some scientists that were teaching bees to recognise faces at various angles and then using the findings of the research to inform better design in computerised face-recognition technology. How do they come up with these ideas? There are some clever people out there.
But, I digress…
The article, while not applying its findings to anything about Biblical origin claims, got me thinking about the relationship between the Creation account in Genesis and scientific study into human and cosmic origins. I know that there are Christians who strongly link Genesis 1 to scientific theories on origins, but I’m not really sure that this is the most useful understanding of the Creation account or of the variety of ways that God might use to reveal Himself to people. I just don’t think that there is enough information on our origins in Genesis 1 for us to have really strong and clear opinions on what we find there. I think we need to keep an open mind on what kind of writing the passage is and what is in it that we can actually take away from it with any confidence.
Awhile ago, I did some study on Genesis 1 and found a body of information that suggested the Hebrews created their own Creation account after being in exile in Babylon and coming across other cultures that had a story about how the universe came about. They didn’t have one and thought they better get onto it, so they borrowed some of the ideas from the stories they had access to and put their own together. Their defining story hadn’t been a Creation account, but the story of how God had saved them from slavery in Egypt. Now, this view of the Creation account would be considered high level heresy for many, many Christian people, but there is a lot of linguistic and anthropological information to support it. But what if it is true? Should a discovery like this be a stumbling block to Christian faith for any person? I don’t think it should be, but of course it would be because of assumptions that people make about what God is like, how God does things, what the Bible is and how the Bible was put together.

Shalom…
Brilliant, humble discussion of the topic, Steve! You certainly are a mature dude.
ReplyDelete